[daisy] Better desktop integration

[Parisi, Lou]

>Jorg wrote:
>It is just so that (for our usecase at least) people often refer to 
>existing msoffice documents when writing documentation or manuals 
>in Daisy. These documents are sourced from external document management
>systems or well-known protected locations on a network drive. 
>The documents are accessible (both r/o and r/w) by many other 
>people that don't even know (or care) about the existence of Daisy. 
>The original master document location thus cannot be changed.

To me it seems like having multiple versions around becomes an
information management problem.  Which is the correct version of a
document?  If the master is not in Daisy, and some people may be editing
the master and not even know about Daisy, then maybe Daisy should just
have a link to the master document on the network share instead of a
potentially outdated copy attached.  

On the other hand, this is really a decision for the actual user so
perhaps you are correct in your interpretation of not imposing too many
restrictions.  Then it just becomes a development resource question
since the two paradigms will have different features.